– Maple syrup production canada immigration – Space Fibra

– Maple syrup production canada immigration

Looking for:

Canada Gazette – Regulations Amending the Maple Products Regulations – Social Sharing

Click here to ENTER


Putting this into perspective, the odds of you finding a taxicab-driving doctor in Canada are very low and the notion of becoming a taxi driver if you were a doctor back home is certainly more fiction than fact. It is important to note that getting your credentials certified is not an easy process. However, there are certain explainable reasons why many people fail to do so. We have previously written about how the research shows that the manner in which you apply for accreditation can make a big difference in whether your credentials are accepted or not.

For example, see our article on Credentials assessment. As far as warnings go, there are many reasons why people suggest that you should not come to Canada, from the weather to the system to taxi driving doctors. The reality is that most of these warnings are either overblown or easily overcome. However, we do acknowledge that one thing has become quite clear with respect to immigrating to Canada. You really do need to find a job before you apply to come to Canada.

Whether it is because of the bias of the new Express Entry System see our article on the Express Entry system , or because of a general change in political attitude that employers should be the gatekeepers of immigration as opposed to governments, coming to Canada without a job has become a very risky proposition and may be the only real barrier you should be thinking about when immigrating to Canada.

Find a Job i n Canada. Immigrate to Canada. Do you want to get in contact with companies who hire people from your specific country? The above-mentioned is intended for general information only and is not intended as legal advice. You need information. Uniivaa is here to help. Frozen Moose and Maple Syrup.

You will need to do this one simple thing if you want a job in Canada You will be mad at yourself for making this mistake when applying to jobs in Canada Need a job in Canada?

Save one million Filipino pesos in one year! Want a job in Canada? How to get your application rejected! How to triple your chances of immigrating to Canada Are you Justin Bieber in the eyes of Canadian employers?

Double your chances of getting immigration status in Canada! Which candidate has the better chance of getting a job in Canada? Bad English? No Problem! How do you jump the line if you want to immigrate to Canada? To succeed with an Immigration Application watch for Misrepresentations Move beyond Express Entry to properly brand yourself and improve your chances of getting a Job in Canada How the Employer Letter can make or break your application to immigrate to Canada You have years to apply to Immigrate to Canada.

What do you do in the meantime? Want to come to Canada as a Permanent Resident? Use a temporary strategy to increase the chances of getting a Job in Canada.

How can you figure out if an employer really wants to hire an international worker for a Job in Canada? Thinking of finding a job in Canada? No love for you? Be resilient to find a job and immigrate to Canada Lost in Translation. Provincial Nominee vs.

Express Entry For a job in Canada be like a Beatle Be fast and make it easy for your future employer to say yes to the call back! How safe is Canada? Walk the streets like its ! What is the best city for a Woman to get a Job and Immigrate to Canada?

Focus on the Small! Working in Canada. Buying into the next hot immigration luxury neighbourhood To find your Dream Job in Canada just cut your Baby in Half Thinking about immigrating to Canada? Technology Always Wins! Want a Job in Canada? Which one is better when trying to immigrate to Canada? Canada is running out of Entrepreneurs! Free Plane Ticket to Canada!

Hey Ya super star do you want a job in Canada? Size does matter! Has Immigration to Canada become far more difficult? A two-year transition implementation period following the coming into force of these amendments allows federally registered establishments to adjust to the new requirements. These establishments are allowed to follow either the current grading system or the new grading system during the transition period.

This allows the establishments to gradually implement the requirements in order to comply with these amendments, including buying and installing new equipment, changing labels, and record keeping. Deregulation was considered, but representatives of the industry indicated a desire to maintain a regulatory system that would adequately enforce the grading and labelling of products.

They were of the opinion that voluntary and self-regulatory approaches would be applied inconsistently, thereby leading to inferior quality maple syrups entering the market. Deregulation was therefore not viewed as a viable option. The status quo was also considered.

However, several regulatory amendments to the MPR are required to address industry concerns as well as permit Canada to align maple syrup grade names and colour standards for maple syrup with U.

The status quo was therefore not viewed as a viable option. Updating the standards was also considered and is the preferred option. The harmonization of grade names and standards as intended by these regulatory amendments will facilitate trade between Canada and the United States and provide consumers with clearer label information.

The amendments present minimal risk while responding to the expectations of industry and stakeholders to improve maple syrup standards, grading and labelling. The potential benefits of these amendments for the maple industry in Canada outweigh the costs. These amendments benefit consumers by providing them clearer information on labels grade name and colour , likely improving their confidence in maple syrup and assisting in their choice of products.

They also benefit industry stakeholders by enhancing export market access. The current grade names and colour classes may unintentionally mislead consumers in their choice of maple syrup by the unclear differentiation relating to grade names and colour variation. A U. James and Barbara H. Canadians are at the same risk of confusion due to the descriptive terms for grade and colour under the current MPR. Other misunderstandings are occurring with the current use of terminology.

Ultimately, this could mean unsatisfied customers and potential loss of future sales. These regulatory amendments address this potential for confusion and limit the potential loss of future sales by providing for grade names, including colour classes, which are more informative and reflective of currently marketed maple syrup products.

Label information reflects the new grade names and colour classes, thereby better informing Canadians. The amendments to the grading and colour classes promote a level playing field between the Canadian and U. Canada and the United States are the only two countries producing maple syrup in the world.

These amendments pave the way for the eventual harmonization of North American maple syrup standards. This should result in a positive impact on free trade as trade will be facilitated between the two countries with the move toward harmonized federal and state grading systems.

Moreover, the integrity of pure maple syrup products will be protected in the marketplace. The costs associated with the amendments to the MPR are based on industry and government estimates. Government costs are solely related to costs to the CFIA. Any increase in the number of consumer and industry inquiries and complaints to the CFIA as a result of the introduction of these amendments is difficult to predict. A costs and benefits questionnaire, intended to gather information on the potential incremental costs and benefits to the maple industry, was included with the consultation document.

Assumptions and calculations for both administrative and compliance costs were confirmed. Costs to the industry are constituted mainly of compliance costs arising from the need to purchase new equipment or upgrade existing colour measurement equipment, as well as costs to train employees on the modified regulatory requirements.

Compliance cost estimates have been revised since prepublication of the proposal in the Canada Gazette , Part I. At the time of prepublication, compliance cost estimates were prepared based on the assumption that businesses would have to purchase a specific brand and type of permanent grading kit. Further to prepublication and based on comments received during the public comment period, the CFIA determined that federally registered establishments will be able to use temporary grading kits that are considerably less expensive than the equipment included in the earlier cost estimate.

Through the public consultation period, the CFIA discovered a further flexibility in respect of the purchase and use of temporary grading kits. The CFIA confirmed that many small businesses currently rely on the use of temporary maple syrup grading kits and replace them as a matter of routine business, often annually. The resulting recalculation of the compliance costs based on this new information results in a reduction of the regulatory burden associated with the amendments.

Administrative costs arise from the effort required by industry for record-keeping activities. Note 1 All government costs are estimated to be one-time costs in the year the amendments are effective, except for the program delivery enforcement costs, which are expected to cover a two-year period — It is assumed there would be an extra 10 complaints per year an increase from 25 to Operational costs are based on feedback from 12 sub-districts while program costs are based on expert opinions.

Note 2 Industry costs were estimated using the Standard Cost Calculator. The time period used was 10 years beginning in the year of implementation of the amendments. All results are expressed in dollar value. B: Michael Farrell. Hall, eds. Karsh, N. Comer, J. Klaassen, H. Auld, and A. F: Rock, B. G: Chabot, B. The small business lens is applicable since these amendments impose additional costs on small businesses.

These amendments impact small businesses. Additional costs to small businesses largely arise from direct compliance costs, such as the need to buy or adjust equipment in order to comply with these amendments, expenses related to any required training regarding the new grading system, and costs incurred to modify labels.

With the recalculation of the equipment costs element, the incremental compliance and administrative costs for small businesses are reduced from those projected during prepublication. The unit costs of temporary kits for grading are significantly less than those used in preparing the earlier cost estimates.

All businesses impacted by the amendments, including small businesses, will be able to use temporary kits. With the additional flexibility provided through the two-year implementation period, the regulatory burden associated with these amendments is reduced.

In addition to compliance costs, there are administrative costs that will be incurred to meet the amended regulatory requirements. Cost calculations are based on industry estimates obtained via consultation.

The following assumptions were made:. The CFIA is moving forward with the flexible regulatory option that provides a transition implementation period following the coming into force of these amendments to allow federally registered establishments time to adjust to the new requirements. These establishments can follow either the current grading system or the new grading system during the transition period.

This allows establishments to gradually implement the requirements in order to comply with these amendments, including buying and installing new equipment, and changing labels. Upon implementation of the amendments, the registered establishments have the flexibility to select the grading equipment of their choice. Small businesses will be able to continue using temporary grading kits, which is consistent with current business practices, to prepare their products according to the new grading system.

These amendments have no impact on small businesses marketing and selling maple products within their own province. In November , the CFIA consulted the public as well as industry, both federally registered and non-federally registered establishments, on proposed amendments to the MPR, including modernizing the grading and colour classes and some corresponding label requirements, which would impact federally registered establishments only.

Seventeen federally registered establishments responded while nine non-federally registered establishments responded. The maple industry representative members of the IMSI, who represent the majority of the maple sector in both Canada and the United States, had previously developed and submitted a proposed approach for modifying the MPR.

In , a committee was formed to review regulatory requirements for maple syrup. The proposed amendments were provided to provincial governments responsible for the intra-provincial marketing of maple syrup. These amendments were also submitted to the state and federal governments in the United States for action. Regulatory amendment proposals are also being advanced in the United States, while the Ontario and Quebec provincial governments await the implementation of the amendments to the MPR to determine what, if any, amendments may be made to their respective regulations for these products.

The consultation was advertised through a news release on November 8, The CFIA used an online survey tool. However, participants were also able to complete and submit consultation responses via email, mail or fax. In addition, a memo was sent to registered maple establishments, industry and associations. Participants were asked to answer questions and comment on the following elements pertaining to the proposed MPR amendments:.

Eighty-five percent of the members of the general public who participated in the consultation generally agreed to all elements of the changes. Seventy-seven percent support was received in terms of the requirement to assign a batch or lot code or code of production. Overall, the written comments received from consumers were supportive and positive.

Although most consumers had no major concerns, some were either uncertain or not in agreement with the subjectivity of the taste descriptors. These consumers felt that the current grading and classification systems are clear and that the new systems would overly simplify grading and classification.

In response to these concerns, the proposed amendments were adjusted for prepublication in the Canada Gazette , Part I. A communication strategy during implementation will also address these concerns by educating consumers on the changes.

The maple packing establishment group indicated that they did not agree with the grades and the colour classes in the amendments under consultation. Many of the industry stakeholder objections pertained to the additional requirement of taste descriptors for the different colours of maple syrup. Many industry respondents felt, as the majority of consumers did, that a taste descriptor would be subjective.

These objections and above-noted concerns were taken into consideration in moving forward with these amendments to the MPR.

In response, the proposed amendments were modified to include a colour class measurable by light transmittance. The proposed taste descriptors would not be measured separately but rather would be linked to a specific colour class. Consumer research has confirmed that colour is the first selection criteria for consumers.

From to , the IMSI developed a proposed approach to standardize the grade names and nomenclature for maple syrup in North America, including holding their own industry consultations. As previously noted, this Institute is composed of the majority of the American states and Canadian provincial maple associations, maple equipment manufacturers and other maple businesses and individuals.

Sixty-three percent of provincial government representatives from maple syrup producing provinces agreed with the proposed amendments. The subjectivity of the taste descriptors was also raised by both the Quebec and Ontario governments. However, these amendments address these concerns by providing for colour classes to be a measurable factor associated with taste descriptors. Concerns were also raised regarding the proposed processing grade standard including the allowance of off-flavours.

Despite the allowance of off-flavours for this proposed grade, there is no change to the health and safety requirements for maple syrup. The CFIA received a total of 14 responses from industry and stakeholders; 12 of the 14 respondents expressed support for the proposed amendments. The responses were generally supportive of the proposed amendments, and are summarized as follows:. These amendments only impact federally registered establishments.

Non-federally registered maple establishments are subject to provincial regulations where they exist. The IMSI as well as national and provincial maple associations continue to strongly encourage provincial governments to align their maple syrup standards with these amendments.

OMAF has indicated no objection to these amendments with support for the two-year phase-in to help address the concerns of small business, while MAPAQ confirmed agreement with the harmonization of the grading standards. New Brunswick Agriculture, Aquaculture and Fisheries NBAAF supports ways to facilitate the marketing and sale of maple syrup, and also supports the betterment of trade by harmonizing standards between Canada and the United States.

NBAAF is in support of the amendments. The Nova Scotia Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Aquaculture reviewed the changes and had no issues with the amendments. Maple Grades Standard. The states of Vermont and Maine have already made changes to their respective State regulations in line with these amendments to the MPR. The State of New York intends to implement maple grade changes into law on January 1, The New Hampshire Department of Agriculture completed public consultations and is scheduled to present the proposed changes for their Standard Grades administrative rules to their Joint Legislative Committee on Administrative Rules in November for phased implementation beginning in January The status of progress in incorporating these amendments into federal regulations is similar in Canada and the United States.

Consistent regulatory progress in Canada and the United States would facilitate the adoption of a new grading system for the maple industry and provide clarity for consumers. Furthermore, consistency in standards across North America benefits domestic and international trade. Once the U. There will be slight differences between the Canadian and American definitions of maple syrup; however, the end product will have to meet similar general requirements minimum and maximum solids content.

This will result in a positive impact on free trade as Canada and the United States will be trading maple products based on the same standards for purity, grading and colour classes. These amendments revise the grading system in a manner that allows all colours of maple syrup to be perceived as equally pure and valuable, provided they meet the taste and quality standards. The move towards a harmonized system will also improve consumer comprehension of maple syrup grades on a North American scale.


Canadian Provinces By The Number Of Maple Syrup Farms – WorldAtlas.Statistical Overview of the Canadian Maple Industry, –

These amendments protect the integrity of pure maple syrup on the international market by requiring that maple syrup be obtained exclusively by the concentration of maple sap or by the solution or dilution of a maple product, other than maple oroduction, in potable water. We know that you have all heard this one before. CanadaCIS solves those mistakes. Production 1. Domestic disappearance represents the productuon food available for human consumption from the Canadian maple syrup production canada immigration supply на этой странице.


Making Maple Syrup – S.3 E – New to Canada podcast.


Maple syrup is made from the xylem sap collected from sugar maple, black maple, or red maple trees during the spring. However, maple syrup can also be made from other species of maple tree. During cold seasons, the maple trees store starch in their roots and trunks before the winter. In late winter and early spring, the starch is then converted to sugar.

Maple syrup is collected by drilling holes into the trunks of maple trees, and the trickling sap is collected. The sap collected is then processed through heating for much of the water to evaporate thus leaving behind the concentrated maple syrup. The indigenous peoples residing in the northeastern region of North America were the first people to have produced maple sugar and maple syrup.

According to archaeological evidence together with indigenous oral evidence, maple syrup was being collected and processed into syrup long before the region experienced an influx of Europeans. There exists no factual accounts as to just how the production and consumption of maple syrup started, but a number of legends exist.

One of the most famous legends includes the use of maple sap instead of water to prepare venison served to a chief. Indigenous tribes established rituals around the making of sugar such as the Maple Dance to celebrate the Sugar Moon which was spring’s first full moon.

A farm where maple syrup is produced is called a sugar wood or Sugarbush. A maple tree begins to be tapped when they reach an age of between 30 and 40 years.

Each Maple tree supports about one to three taps with an average tree producing about 9. The number of maple syrup farms in Quebec, Canada is 7, farms, the highest of any province in the country. Ontario is the second largest Canadian province with a number of maple syrup farms with about 2, farms which produce much smaller amounts of maple syrup.

The third largest Canadian province with the number of farms is New Brunswick with farms. Sugar shacks are an important aspect of the Canadian culture, particularly in Quebec. Many families spend their Easter dinner dining together at a Sugar Shack to consume some of the traditional culinary coated with maple syrup. Usually, people consume food coated with maple syrup while enjoying the rhythm of Quebec folk tunes. Maple sap being collected in a maple syrup farm in Canada. Joyce Chepkemoi April 25 in Economics.

World’s Top 5 Diamond-Producing Countries. Top 10 Natural Gas Producing Countries. World’s Top 5 Gold-Producing Countries. Industrial Revolution.


Canada – The Land of Maple Leaf.

Due to favourable weather conditions, Canadian maple producers harvested million gallons of maple syrup in , surpassing the record. Yet, every once in a while we come across an article describing the reasons why you should NOT immigrate to Canada. We look at a couple of these warnings.

Deixe um comentário

O seu endereço de e-mail não será publicado. Campos obrigatórios são marcados com *